In a case that it characterized as one of first impression in the federal courts of appeals, the Seventh Circuit held last week that the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, 38 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq. (“USERRA”), may, in some circumstances, require employers to provide paid leave to employees absent from work due to … Continue Reading
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s recent decision in Stuntz v. Lion Elastomers, LLC, Case No. 19-40336 (Sept. 23, 2020), offers some reassurance to employers that wage and hour issues can be properly (and finally) resolved in grievance settlements. The employer in Stuntz permitted its production employees to clock in as early … Continue Reading
While California’s wage-and-hour rules recognize a number of exceptions for employees subject to a collective bargaining agreement, the California Supreme Court’s denial of review in Gutierrez v. Brand Energy Svcs. of Calif. is a reminder that such exceptions are not without limits. Case No. A154604, review denied 9/9/20. The California wage order at issue in … Continue Reading
A recent decision from the Eastern District of Wisconsin serves as a strong reminder that well-crafted handbook policies can sometimes save the day for employers in proposed Fair Labor Standards Act collective actions. Amandah v. Alro Steel Corp., No. 19-CV-1607-JPS (E.D. Wis. Aug. 21, 2020). The plaintiff in Amandah brought a proposed collective action against … Continue Reading
D.R. Horton Ruling May Survive, However With all due respect, Meatloaf, you were wrong. It turns out that two out of three is, in fact, bad. The United States Supreme Court held today that President Obama’s 2012 appointments to the National Labor Relations Board were not valid recess appointments under the United States Constitution. NLRB … Continue Reading
But Can The Good Guys Avoid A Last Second Goal In This Case? The Ninth Circuit’s decision in Johnmohammadi v. Bloomingdales, Inc., Case No. 12-55578 (9th Cir. June 23, 2014), should have employers feeling as good as the U.S. Men’s Soccer team up through the fourth minute of added time in the second half of … Continue Reading
“The Pen Is Mightier Than The Sword…And Verbal Communications During Company-Wide Employee Meetings.” Things seem to be going from bad to worse for defunct law firm Dewey & LeBoeuf. As criminal charges continue to loom for some former Dewey partners, the judge overseeing Dewey’s bankruptcy has now ruled that the firm cannot assert the “faltering … Continue Reading
The EEOC learns what it’s like to be the statue and not the pigeon. The EEOC can’t seem to catch a break these days. After a string of recent cases in which the agency has been forced to pay employer attorneys’ fees for bringing frivolous claims, the most recent zinger came from the Sixth Circuit … Continue Reading
“The Last Inch Is The One That Counts” The recent decision in Silva v. Tegrity Personnel Svcs., Inc., Case No. 4:13-cv-00860 (S.D. Tex. 12/5/2013), suggests that some district courts haven’t fully embraced the Supreme Court’s holding in Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk, 133 S. Ct. 1523, 1528 (2013). The plaintiff in Silva filed a proposed … Continue Reading
“I Blew Off My Exempt Duties” Insufficient To Establish Jury Question. Slackers everywhere may have shed a tear in their Doritos on Friday after reading the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Reyes v. Goya Foods, Inc., Case No. 13-12827 (11th Cir. 12/6/13). The plaintiff in Reyes sought to bring an FLSA collective action against the defendant … Continue Reading
Crow Doesn’t Taste Too Bad….If You Season It Right. AT&T Mobility appears determined to make it onto the Christmas card list of every employer in the United States. In yet another big win for AT&T, the Ninth Circuit recently overturned its own case law and held that a defendant must establish CAFA’s $5 million jurisdictional amount simply by a preponderance of the … Continue Reading
If You Can’t Beat ‘Em, Join ‘Em In a development as incongruously surprising as Lady Gaga becoming President, the Ninth Circuit has enforced a class action waiver. Richards v. Ernst & Young, Case No. 17530 (August 21, 2013). On its own, that may only have been as shocking as, say, Ralph Nader taking the Oval … Continue Reading
The Supreme Court’s Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes opinion has once again played Bo and Luke to a plaintiff’s Boss Hogg. The plaintiffs in Raposo v. Garelick Farms LLC, Case No. 11-11943, D. Mass. (July 11, 2013), were truck drivers who made deliveries out of two locations operated by a dairy distribution company. The company … Continue Reading
What Does The Supreme Court’s Decision In Italian Colors Mean For The NLRB’s D.R. Horton Decision? As our readers will no doubt recall, the Supreme Court boldly struck a blow for truth, justice and the American Way a few years ago in its approval of class action waivers in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, 131 S. … Continue Reading
No “One-And-Done” Rule For FLSA Collective Actions Perhaps it’s a tad unrealistic, but here’s hoping that John Calipari’s one-and-done recruiting strategies start influencing FLSA jurisprudence now that he’s finally won a national championship. From an employer’s perspective, it’s hard to tell whether the recent denial of conditional certification in Jenkins v. The TJX Companies is … Continue Reading
In a decision that will thrill readers of all ages with its scintillating recitation of the Portal-to-Portal Act’s legislative history, the Third Circuit has held that there is no inherent incompatibility between the opt-in mechanism of Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (that’s 29 U.S.C. 216(b) for those of you keeping score at … Continue Reading
Is the GOP slipping something into the water supply in San Francisco? Do they know some dirty secrets about some Ninth Circuit judges? Has the whole world gone crazy? The Ninth Circuit’s decision a few days ago in Delodder v. Aerotek, Inc. continues an encouraging—and surprising—trend in Ninth Circuit wage and hour law toward emphasizing … Continue Reading
“Stolt Who . . . .?” If you’ve heard a rushing sound in your ears the last few months, it may be the rug being pulled out from under employers who thought they finally had clarity on the legal status of class arbitration. (Or, it may be a serious medical condition, so you should probably … Continue Reading
“Hey, Where’d You Get That Document?” ESI has become one of the most despised three-letter combinations in corporate America (and the lawyers who dutifully serve it). The costs and risks associated with a company’s duty to preserve ESI are a headache of their own, but the dangers in production turn that headache into a full-fledged … Continue Reading
An Irritable Pessimist’s View of a Welcome Decision After several years of waiting, the California Supreme Court handed down its long-anticipated decision in Harris v. Superior Court last week. Given the natural-born suspicion held by management-side lawyers toward anything that wanders its way out of the wilderness that is the California courts, it probably comes as … Continue Reading
Having already struck out on a curveball they thought was a fastball over the middle of the plate, Schering Corp. is now 0 for 2 following the latest ruling from the Connecticut federal district court in Kuzinski et al. v. Schering Corp.pdf., Case No. 3:07-cv-0233-JBA (D. Conn. August 5, 2011). The case began over four years ago, when Schering’s sales reps … Continue Reading
The Second Appellate District in California recently affirmed a trial court’s refusal to certify a class of store managers in Mora, et al. v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.pdf., Case No. B221949 (April 18, 2011). Whether this case should be treated as a welcome sign for employers, however, remains an enigma wrapped inside a riddle (served … Continue Reading
A wise man (who we’d never heard of until searching for witty quotes with which to open this article) once said, “Procrastination is the bad habit of putting off until the day after tomorrow what should have been done the day before yesterday.” The UAW will undoubtedly attest to this notion following the decision earlier this year … Continue Reading
“Hey, Judge, You Don’t Understand……I Just Wanted The Money!” About two dozen people who opted into an FLSA collective action in Nevada federal court may soon be reminded that the pinch is usually in the fine print. Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen recommended sanctions against these individuals after they refused to respond to discovery. In … Continue Reading