For many years, state and federal courts in California have opposed arbitration and have manufactured frameworks under which they become unenforceable despite the clear directives of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and countless Supreme Court cases. While a string of Supreme Court cases over the past decade gave employers some respite, the Ninth Circuit has … Continue Reading
We’ve noted several times in this blog the difficulties parties may face when trying to obtain court approval for a settlement they have reached. Recognizing many of these issues, new amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e) are scheduled to take effect on Dec. 1, 2018. One of the proposed amendments requires that “[t]he … Continue Reading
Ernest Angley is an evangelist and purported faith healer who operates a large church in Akron known as Grace Cathedral. It would be difficult to parody him, as his appearance, mannerisms and method of faith healing are already almost over the top. He has his own TV show (and network), and you can find lots … Continue Reading
As we’ve commented before, class actions frequently take on a life of their own. They involve large sums of money, frequently raise difficult discovery and case management issues, and are subject to surprises for all the litigants. At the same time, recognizing that tensions exist between the class and class counsel regarding attorney fees, courts are … Continue Reading
One deliberately ironic facet of the 2004 film Howard Hughes bio-pic The Aviator (the one with Leonardo DiCaprio) is the fact that the airlines fighting for world dominance in the 1940s were Howard Hughes’ TWA and Juan Trippe’s Pan Am. By the time of the movie, of course, both famous airlines were gone. Pan Am’s … Continue Reading
We’ve commented several times recently on the increasing scrutiny courts are giving to class action settlements generally, and to attorney fee awards in particular. A recent decision from the Ninth Circuit, although it ultimately upholds the award, reflects that this is still a troublesome area and less than entirely predictable for any of the parties. … Continue Reading
We’ve written at least twice now on class actions arising out of time spent by employees going through security lines, primarily at the end of their shifts. The question is whether and when such time might be compensable under the Portal-to-Portal Act. One of the critical issues is whether the security is being undertaken primarily … Continue Reading
As we’ve commented before, disability claims are particularly poor fodder for class actions. Unlike other protected traits, there are often threshold questions as to whether an individual is even in a protected class. Even in those instances where the lead plaintiff is disabled, there may be questions as to which disabilities might be covered – … Continue Reading
A common feature of class action settlements, whether in employment actions or otherwise, is the payment of an incentive award to the named plaintiff. Such payments are frequently approved by courts, but have been criticized as unduly promoting class claims. Indeed, the 2003 version of CAFA, which passed the House but not the senate, would … Continue Reading
A Sixth Circuit panel has ruled that courts rather than arbitrators should determine whether class arbitration is authorized when the arbitration agreement “says nothing about classwide arbitration.” Citing First Options of Chicago v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938, 945 (1995), the Court was clear that an arbitrator can only decide “class arbitrability” “if the parties have … Continue Reading
Co-Authored By: Ruth E. Hartman Introduction The U.S. Supreme Court heard the much anticipated oral argument in American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant on February 27, 2013. The issue before the Court was whether an arbitration clause which prohibits class actions should be enforced if the claimant could establish that enforcement of the clause would … Continue Reading
While there were no blockbuster cases in 2012 in the league of 2011’s Concepcion and Dukes decisions, it was still an eventful year. The Supreme Court accepted its first case under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), lower courts and the NLRB continue to address class action waivers, and many courts have grappled with issues … Continue Reading
Editors’ Note: This post is being jointly published on BakerHostetler’s Class Action Lawsuit Defense blog. Over the past few years, the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), the federal law mandating, among other things, procedures and reporting requirements employers must follow when conducting background checks through a third party vendor, has become a hot-button employment issue, … Continue Reading
Co-authored by Dustin M. Dow A familiar debate involving alternative methods of statutory interpretation erupted again at the Supreme Court on Monday, January 7, 2013. The debate unfolded in The Standard Fire Insurance Company v. Knowles, No. 11-1450, a case that could have a significant impact on the business community that has benefitted from several … Continue Reading
Mandatory retirement ages have been largely eliminated for most employees, but still continue in a handful of areas. For many years, the Federal Aviation Administration prohibited pilots over the age of 60 from flying for commercial airlines. In 2007, that limit was raised to age 65 for domestic flights. But what about private pilots working … Continue Reading
It’s difficult to capture lightning in a bottle, an idiom that is especially true in the world of television production. As we grind into the first full week of November, many of the new series that premiered only a few scant weeks ago have already vanished from the air. (Made in Jersey, anyone?) Indeed, for … Continue Reading
One of the primary catalysts for class action litigation both in the employment context and outside of it is the availability of attorney’s fees. In many cases, plaintiffs can recover their “reasonable” attorney fees, and predictably fees are frequently a key topic in settlement negotiations. So, what is a “reasonable” attorney fee award? Many courts … Continue Reading
The Third Time is Not a Charm as the Second Circuit Again Holds Class Action Waivers Unenforceable The Second Circuit considered the validity of class action waivers for the third time in an antitrust action brought against American Express (“AMEX”) based upon the company’s Card Acceptance Agreement. And, despite intervening Supreme Court opinions, for the … Continue Reading
Today, June 20, 2011, the Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Wal-Mart Stores Inc v Dukes.pdf Case No. 10-277 (U.S. S. Ct. June 20, 2011). The Court not only reversed the Ninth Circuit, but issued several clear pronouncements regarding the plaintiff’s burdens and the quality of evidence necessary to certify an employment class. … Continue Reading
The Supreme Court has now held that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. section 2, preempts state laws that would condition arbitration agreements on the availability of class action arbitration procedures. AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion.pdf, 563 U.S. ____ (April 27, 2011). This new holding overturns prior holdings from California as well as other jurisdictions, and … Continue Reading
Although you could ascribe a number of interesting characteristics to actor Charlie Sheen these days, “selfish” isn’t one of them, at least if you believe some of his now famous complaint. In the lawsuit the former “Two and a Half Men” sitcom star filed March 10 against the show’s producers and WB Studio Enterprises, Inc., … Continue Reading
Some defense counsel breath a sigh of relief after they manage to remove a class action to federal court but, as the case below illustrates, the battle may be far from won. The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”) permits defendants to remove a diversity action from state to federal court when certain criteria … Continue Reading
The Dukes decision crossed several lines by certifying the class at the expense of the employer's defenses. The Supreme Court should accept certiorari and reverse.… Continue Reading