Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is the provision that requires those participating in a federal claim for minimum wages or overtime to opt in to the class, making Rule 23 inapplicable. The same enforcement applies to claims under the Equal Pay Act (EPA), 29 U.S.C. Section 206(d). The EPA is itself … Continue Reading
We’ve noted before that while conditional certification motions are often granted, such classes fare far less well at the second decertification stage and just as poorly on the eve of trial. See: “Ninth Circuit Affirms Decertification of FLSA Off-the-Clock Case” from Sept. 21, 2018, and “Ohio District Court Decertifies Class of Health Care Workers in … Continue Reading
No, that isn’t a typo – it was the Ninth Circuit. Those familiar with collective action litigation are already familiar with the two-step paradigm most courts use to evaluate collective action claims. In the first stage, commonly misnamed “conditional certification,” the court determines whether to authorize notice to the putative class. In doing so, most courts … Continue Reading
In a number of cases, the plaintiffs’ strategy in collective active litigation under the Fair Labor Standards Act may fall into a familiar pattern: file the case, do minimal discovery, move for conditional certification under the first-tier lenient standard, and then settle before decertification. While frustrating for employers, it can be, and often is, a … Continue Reading
Nothing succeeds like success. Four years ago, in Morgan v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc., 551 F.3d 1233 (11th Cir. 2008), the Eleventh Circuit upheld a $35+ million jury award against the Family Dollar store discount chain for allegedly misclassifying its store managers as exempt. Predictably, retailers, already a target (no pun intended) of such litigation, … Continue Reading
When I was growing up, my father had a workshop he used to relax on weekends. While he enjoyed doing projects, he also regularly misplaced tools, much to the frustration of everyone. When my brother moved out of the house, he also lost the only other person he could blame for losing them. In the … Continue Reading
When James Bond brandishes his Walther PPK and walks into a printing plant, you know one thing is certain – you will be “treated” to at least a half-dozen newspaper puns. And, since this article is about a recent California case involving newspaper carriers, it will, of course, be no different. Ever since Wal-Mart Stores, … Continue Reading
As we have commented before in this blog, courts considering certification of collective actions under the FLSA often use the two-step procedure generally attributed to the court in Lusardi v. Xerox Corp., 118 F.R.D. 351 (D.N.J. 1987). Under that procedure, the court first determines whether to “conditionally” or “provisionally” certify the class. This first step typically relies … Continue Reading
Many courts today use the two-step procedure described in Lusardi v. Xerox Corp., 99 F.R.D. 89 (D.N.J.1983), to decide whether to certify potential classes under section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Under that procedure, the court the court looks at certification twice, first before much discovery is done, and again at the close … Continue Reading
After nearly 8 years of litigation, the Court of Appeals of Oregon recently affirmed the decertification of a class of between 600 to 1900 former U.S. Bank employees who claimed they were not timely paid after their termination. Belknap v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 235 Ore. App. 658 (2010). Following extensive discovery, the court found … Continue Reading