Tag Archives: “Rule 23(a)(2)”

Illinois District Court Denies Certification of Discrimination Action Due to Problematic Class Representatives

By Greg Mersol on June 11, 2020 Posted in Discrimination

A key premise of a class action is that a court can, in essence, review the merits of the class representative’s claims and apply the result of that review across the class as a whole. This concept is most readily found in Rule 23(a)(2) (commonality), (a)(3)(typicality) and (a)(4)(adequacy of representation), but it also finds its way into … Continue Reading

Dukes Claims California Meal and Rest Period Cases

By Greg Mersol on January 31, 2012 Posted in Meal and Rest Periods, Retail, Wage and Hour

The Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 131 S. Ct. 2541 (2011), seems to be taking hold in meal and rest period cases in California, as shown by two decisions handed down this month. The most recent casualty of the holding in Dukes is Cortez v. Best Buy Stores, LP, Case No. … Continue Reading